Audit failed on Arbitrum

Metrics describe behavior; the contract describes what is possible. CaliberToken runs survivors through real security providers — GoPlus on EVM chains, RugCheck on Solana — and rejects any token whose contract contains hard risks: honeypot logic that blocks selling, mint functions that can inflate supply to zero value, pausable transfers, or buy/sell taxes extreme enough to function as confiscation.

An audit rejection is the most serious verdict in the log because it is a property of the code itself, not a momentary market state. The evidence field records the exact flags the provider returned.

Market-driven rejections can change in the next cycle; contract-driven rejections cannot. A honeypot clause, an uncapped mint or a 90% sell tax does not improve with time — the only honest grade for such a contract is refusal.

Arbitrum's token launch culture skews toward smaller but more technically literate deployers. Rejection volume is lower than the launchpad-heavy networks, and a larger share of rejections come from contract-level flags rather than empty pools.